Rant: The community researching unknown creatures, such as bigfoot, need to place eyewitness sketches on their research web sites with dates. Currently the sketches are hap-hazard and cross-contaminating. Especially bad are the sites with bigfoot "art" interspersed with the "eyewiteness" accounts. This muddies the water for true research.
A question to be answered would be to look at the earliest sketches and see how the face of the creature was constructed. What points stood out in the witnesses memory because these could provide clues as to the ancestry of this creature.
If, for example, earliest sketches were more gorilla-like in appearance or more like the orang's face, these could provide valuable clues as to the genetic relationships between the NA creature and Asian species. Various other details could provide more clues to support the authenticity of the sighting - but not without those all crucial dates and places attached to the images.
If, on the other hand, the face features fangs and slobbering jaw - please refer to recent cinema posters for inspiration and not into the wilds of the forests.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment